Delta Force Review Bombed for Kernel Anti-Cheat: Is It Safe
Many gamers have been review bombing Delta Force due to its Kernel-level Anti-Cheat system, GTI Security. Many players feel that the game’s EAC is invasive, a massive breach of privacy, and causes a multitude of hardware problems. However, most complaints seem unfounded, as many claim that the Delta Force Kernel Anti-Cheat is safe and needed.
Table of Contents
What are Kernel-Level Anti-Cheats
An anti-cheat operating on a Kernel Level gains access to the deepest authoritative layer of a user’s OS. It can scan and gather information to check for programs that can be flagged as cheats. While on the surface level, it’s intrusive, it’s necessary to help combat the rampant cheating in the gaming industry.
Delta Force Gets Review Bombed for Kernel EAC
Delta Force has Mixed Reviews on their Steam page just a few hours after it went live. Most of the comments are directed at their usage of a Kernel-based Anti-Cheat. Most posts on the review page claim that the game’s program either continues to run while the game is closed, spies on them, or keeps reinstalling itself even if Delta Force has been removed.
While privacy claims are warranted concerning any Kernel-level program, Delta Force has few options if it wants to combat cheating effectively. Many game fans feel those who sent terrible reviews based on the anti-cheat are mainly cheaters. These sentiments are based on testing claims made in reviews and other analyses from more knowledgeable PC users.
Delta Force is Safe
Regarding the claims that Delta Force Anti-Cheat is unsafe, a Reddit user made quick tests to debunk several common complaints on the review page. According to this thread, the Anti-Cheat Engine works like most Kernel-based programs and does not run when the game is closed nor does it keep reinstalling itself. However, the user cannot disprove whether the software collects info or spies on players.
Generally, any Kernel-based Anti-Cheat will collect data to analyze and see if you have suspicious third-party apps installed that can be potentially used for cheating. Many users point out that the data collection for ACE is minimal, unlike other games, and you should only worry about privacy issues if you’re a high-profile figure. In one thread, a user claimed that most of those complaining about the Anti-Cheat are cheaters. Generally, gaming standards consider Delta Force safe, with it having the least invasive AC program.
Will Kernel-Level Anti-Cheat Ever Get Replaced
Unfortunately, many tech experts have agreed that Kernel-Level Anti-Cheat will be replaced soon. Developing a program that is not profoundly invasive to combat cheaters will cost too much, and using server-side anti-cheats is highly vulnerable. In addition, any development of such programs means that cheat developers will also up their game in an endless cat-and-mouse chase. Kernel-level programs are the most consistent for combatting cheating software for now.
